As preparations continue for Google’s proposed Project Dazzler data center in Franklin Furnace, a recent court filing offers a glimpse into what happens after a major development company purchases land for a large-scale project.
Tilted Gate LLC, the company that acquired hundreds of acres for the planned data center campus, has filed an eviction action in Scioto County Municipal Court against John Bowen, whose address is listed as a residence on property included in the development area.
A hearing on the matter has been scheduled for July 15.
The filing appears to involve a home located on property that is now owned by Tilted Gate as part of the planned data center site.
According to Scioto County property records, the property changed hands several times over the years.
Records show the property sold for $78,500 in 2000. In 2015, it was transferred to Norfolk Southern Railway for $0. Then, in January 2026, the property became part of the larger land acquisition purchased by Tilted Gate LLC for $8,899,900.
County records indicate the parcel includes a three-bedroom home built in 1991.
The property’s most recent appraisal listed a total value of $167,389, including a structure value of $151,899 and a land value of $15,490.
The court filing does not explain the relationship between Bowen and the property. However, the filing suggests Tilted Gate may be seeking possession of a residence located within land acquired for the proposed development.
The case highlights one of the less-publicized aspects of major economic development projects. While much of the public discussion surrounding the Franklin Furnace data center has focused on jobs, tax revenue, water usage, environmental concerns, and infrastructure improvements, large projects also require developers to gain control of all property needed for construction.
Google has described Project Dazzler as a proposed $1 billion, 500,000-square-foot data center complex planned for the Franklin Furnace area. The project would include multiple supporting buildings, electrical infrastructure, and roadway improvements if it moves forward as proposed.
At this point, it is unclear whether the eviction filing involves one of the final remaining occupied structures within the project’s footprint or whether additional property-related proceedings could follow.
The case remains pending in Scioto County Municipal Court, with a hearing scheduled for July 15.
